|
Evidence that animals cannot evolve
to become humans
|
|
HUMANS
|
|
A human has accurate mental models of:
o self
o environment
o relationships
between self and environment
o relationships
between self and others
o relationships
between others and environment
o relationships
between others and others.
0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
In a human: all these mental models are linked together
to form one, big, unbroken, organically structured,
mental model of everything, with few fractures.
‘Organic’, here, meaning: like a spider’s web
with the most important bits in the middle.
It’s the most efficient arrangement.
Hence it evolved into being
in us, and in God (God built himself, evolved).
|
|
1) Your
mental model-of-everything:
is organically structured
with few
fractures,
both of which make your mind
more efficient.
2a) The fabric of your
mental model-of-everything
is made of:
Memories of:
sights & sounds, e.g.
words,
smells, tastes, &
touches,
of this temporary universe,
that you’ve taken in,
2b) The framework of your mental model-of-everything
is made of:
Phrases & concepts,
made
of words:
that you’ve built
inside
yourself.
That the mind’s
framework is made of words
makes it even more
efficient.
|
|
.
|
|
To conclude:
1) and 2b)
increase the efficiency of
our mental model-of-everything.
This increased efficiency
of our mental
model-of-everything
then causes
our high
applied-intelligence.
|
.
|
|
ANIMALS
|
|
Animals, unlike humans,
do not each have:
one, big,
mental model,
of everything they know.
Instead, animals have:
many, small, disconnected,
mental models,
of everything they know.
|
|
This is because an animal’s behaviour
is based on only pain & pleasure:
For example:
At a water hole
an animal sees a dead member
of its own species.
It starts to learn the
scene.
|
|
But,
the more it realises
that death & decay are
its own destiny also,
the more frightening,
mentally painful,
the scene becomes.
As it operates on only pain
& pleasure
it stops learning the scene.
|
|
After
a drink, it wanders over the hill to a lake
with logs floating in it.
This new scene is ripe for
inventing the dug-out canoe.
But this new scene must
first be learnt.
The animal is hesitant:
It knows it once found
a scene
that was so
frightening, so painful,
that it had to stop
learning it.
Is this another one of
those scenes?
|
|
The
trouble is – it doesn’t know much about
the first frightening scene
because it was too painful
to learn it properly.
So it doesn’t know whether
this new scene
is another frightening scene
or not.
But it does know it was able
to learn a little
about the first frightening
scene
before it got too
frightening.
|
|
So,
even if this new scene is another frightening one,
it’s safe to learn a little
about it.
But only a little.
|
|
So,
the animal learns only a little
about the potential dug-out
canoe scene.
Indeed, it learns only a
little about all scenes.
But, unfortunately, it needs
to learn about a scene fully
in order to visualise
inventions,
visualise the changes that
need to be made to the scene.
|
|
.
|
|
Even
if an animal does not, itself, experience this,
it will have inherited this
reaction/response
from those that have experienced it.
|
.
|
|
A TECHNICAL VERSION OF THE ABOVE
|
|
An animal’s behaviour, and therefore also
thinking,
is based on only pain & pleasure.
So it finds mental models of
its own temporary nature
disturbing, painful.
So it becomes less observant
at death situations.
|
|
So
it records only poor mental models
of death situations.
So it possesses only poor mental models
of death situations.
|
|
So
it cannot tell
which situations are death
situations
and which are not.
So it
cannot tell
which situations to become
less observant at
and which not.
|
|
So
it becomes less observant
at all situations.
So it records only poor mental models
of all situations.
So it possesses only poor mental models
of all situations.
|
|
So,
it possesses only:
many, small,
disconnected, mental models
of all the situations
it’s experienced.
Does not possess:
one,
big, organically structured,
mental model-of-everything,
with no
breaks/fissures
& with its framework made of words
as we humans do.
|
.
|
|
Home page
|
Next webpage:
More
evidence that animals cannot evolve
to become humans.
|
|
|
|
|