|
Making the
universe
|
|
EVOLUTION: THE SCIENTIFICALLY ELEGANT SOLUTION
|
|
In Gen c1:
0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
I
reckon God intended the Bible
account of Creation to be:
partly true:
It did not take six days Gen c1
but billions of
years.
Yet he Bible
lists each item’s occurrence
in nearly the
correct historical order:
1. light
the sun
2. a spinning
planet day & night
3. sea
due to the great rain, 3.8 billion years ago, after the
ground temperature had dropped below 100
degrees C,
4. land what the great rain did not cover,
5. land vegetation
6. seasons made apparent by the land vegetation
7. fish *these should
be before land vegetation
8. birds
9. land animals *these should be before
birds.
yet also partly fictional:
The Bible
says that:
on
the first day
God
made day & night, i.e. light, Gen c1 v1-5
yet also that:
it’s
not until the fourth day
that
God made the Sun Gen c1 v14-19.,
|
|
In fact, a big bang is the only way God could have brought
such a set of Indivisible Factors into existence.
So, the universe started as a big bang
then took billions of years to take shape.
|
|
Immediately after the big bang, & onwards,
God could have intervened.
But, letting the stars & planets form on their own
was the scientifically elegant thing to do.
It also gave the impression
that the universe was accidental,
thus helping faith to exist.
Perhaps see later section:
WHAT’S WRONG WITH A VISIBLE SOLUTION? , , .
|
.
|
|
Perhaps also see item
1)
of earlier section: MY
ATTITUDE TO THE BIBLE, , .
|
|
.
|
|
|
EVOLUTION
OF PLANTS & ANIMALS
|
|
God designed the material of the universe
so that everything evolves:
not only stars & planets
but also plants &
animals.
|
|
Again, this was the scientifically elegant
thing to do:
design the material of the
universe
so that parts of
it
live and die
but
reproduce
which
prevents extinction
and, incidentally, increases numbers
automatically
improving their own design
with
time.
|
|
.
|
|
Note
to atheists:
It is not scientific to think that
nature designed animals
so that their
hunger is painful
and
their mating is pleasant
to make them continue to exist.
It is scientific to think that only animals
that happened to find that
their hunger is
painful
and their mating
is pleasant
would continue to exist.
Conversely, for believers:
It is scientific to think that
God designed matter
therefore God designed animals
so that their hunger
is painful
and their mating
is pleasant
to make them continue to exist.
|
|
.
|
|
|
MIRACULOUS
TWEAKS
TO THE UNIVERSE?
|
|
Perhaps God planted life here:
Perhaps RNA & DNA would
never have occurred naturally
and so were miraculous
tweaks.
Or perhaps RNA & DNA did occur naturally
but God subsequently helped life
evolve:
Perhaps by occasionally
miraculously tweaking
(the components of) various
life forms.
The
asteroid, 65 million years ago,
that wiped out all the
dinosaurs
was handy for us.
Perhaps that was a
miraculous tweak.
|
|
But, even if there
have never been any miraculous
tweaks,
even if everything that happened
here
happened for only natural reasons,
then God still gets all the credit
for designing matter the way he did:
Evolution
does not disprove God.
Evolution merely proves how
clever he is.
|
|
.
|
|
|
NO WAITING
|
|
God can travel in time in Heaven.
, Perhaps see later webpages:
, There is time in Heaven
, and:
, Time
travel occurs in Heaven.
Hence God did not have to wait for his creation to mature.
To him – it all happened instantly.
|
|
.
|
|
|
THE MIRACULOUS TWEAK
TO PRODUCE HUMAN LIFE
|
|
To make humans:
God tweaked a specie of ape (or a few members of it)
to be eternal.
Even though they remained
made of
temporary materials.
|
|
Genesis c1 phrases this tweak as:
Gen c1 v27:
So God created man in
his own image,
in the image of God created he him … ctd KJV
Whereas Gen c2 – c3 goes into more detail:
E.G. Gen c2 v7:
And the LORD God formed man
of the dust of the ground,
and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life;
and man became a living soul. KJV
|
|
.
|
|
|
TREAT THE BIBLICAL ADAM & EVE
AS REAL
|
|
I wrote, at the
beginning of this webpage,
that the whole of the biblical
Creation account
is partly true, partly fictional.
|
|
Likewise, the part of
the Creation account
where God makes humans
is also partly true, partly fictional.
Partly true:
o Eternality
cannot evolve into existence:
you’re either eternal
or you’re not.
So there must have been
the first human(s)
however we were made.
o Regarding the tree of
knowledge of good & evil:
humans actually do have a knowledge of good & evil
that animals simply do
not have.
o Regarding the tree of life:
humans
actually are temporary, flesh, like
animals,
yet also eternal.
Partly fictional:
o The
Bible makes much of Adam’s & Eve’s origins.
But nothing of the
origins of
the people their
children marry,
nor of the many other
people, already living,
for which there is
archaeological proof.
See also: Gen c4 – c5.
, Perhaps again see item 1)
, of earlier section: MY ATTITUDE
TO THE BIBLE, , .
|
|
I reckon that:
When, 3,300 years ago, God spoke
to Moses about our origins,
God could not tell him the true account.
It would have been too technical,
too scientific:
would have required a lot of
background material
that didn’t exist then.
God had to tell him a simpler version.
Hence the first chapters of
Genesis. Gen c1–c3
As soon as this simple version was
written
it was used as a reference for all
other such material.
,
, I reckon that Jesus, being God’s Son,
knew about the above simplification.
, Perhaps that’s why Jesus did not refer
to Adam & Eve by name
, but merely referred to them as male
& female.
, Matt c19 v4-6 and
Mark c10 v6-9
, Luke referred to Adam, in Luke c3 v38.
, But he wasn’t quoting Jesus.
|
|
I
reckon the real Adam(s) & Eve(s)
were a specie of ape
that, seven million years ago,
God made, along with any descendants, to be eternal.
Perhaps see later section: THIS INCLUDES ALL DESCENDANTS.
Our eternal
quality then caused
an exponential increase
in our applied-intelligence:
I.E. Caused
changes in behaviour
and,
simultaneously,
a corresponding
rearranging & enlarging of the brain.
Our enlarging
brain and changing behaviour
then gradually
changed the rest of our anatomy.
I explain how, in detail, in the next two webpages.
|
|
Thus, many of the commonly accepted
cause-&-effect lines of human evolution
are the wrong way round:
The causes of:
walking upright
walking further
grasping better
comprehending
better
grunts becoming
words
experimenting
with fire & tools
experimenting
with foods
increase in brain
size
bodily changes
associated with all the above
were, in fact:
internal,
not external.
|
|
It
wasn’t some elusive, unique,
combination of
the external
changing the internal.
It was the internal
changing the external.
|
|
Hence
it took seven million years
for the gradual, but
exponential, humanisation
of our species.
|
|
However:
What do the real Adam(s)
& Eve(s), seven million years ago,
tell us about ourselves?
Little.
Nothing of
importance.
What do the Adam & Eve of the Bible
tell
us about ourselves?
Much.
All
of great importance.
So,
treat the Bible account as true.
|
|
.
|
|
, , I think that Christians who insist that:
, , , , God made the universe in six days
, , , , or even that the entire Bible is true,
, , are mistaken.
, But, I notice that God responds to them
, exactly as if the entire Bible were indeed
true.
, Blue text copied from item 1)
, of earlier section: MY
ATTITUDE TO THE BIBLE, , .
|
|
.
|
|
|
CREATING
MATTER,
BUT MAKING HUMANS
|
|
|
Moses
(& others) saw that:
Soil is food for plants.
Plants are food for animals
& humans
and animals are food for
humans.
Plants, animals, & humans
all eventually turn to soil.
Hence it’s apparent that we are made of
the same materials as our surroundings.
Hence it was intuitive for (God, through) Moses,
to state our origin as:
made of the dust of the
ground
with God then breathing life
into it.
Gen c2
v7:
And the LORD God formed man
of the dust of the ground,
and
breathed into his nostrils the breath of life;
and
man became a living soul. KJV
|
|
|
But,
how was Moses supposed to state where the dust came from?
The
answer should be to simply write that the dust was created.
Hence, in the KJV, in Gen c1 – c2:
the verbs:
created
and said
should both
mean:
created –
out of nothing
and the verbs:
made
and make
and formed
should mean:
made –
out of already created material.
Perhaps
print a copy of Gen c1 – c2
highlighting
the verbs with different colours.
However, the verbs were used sloppily, interchangeably:
o In Gen c1 v26-27
and Gen c2 v7-8,
compare the
word make in verse 26
and the 2
words formed in verses 7 & 8
with
the 3 words
created in verse 27.
o in Gen c1 v27,
compare the
3rd word created
with, in Gen c2 v22,
the word made.
o in Gen c2 v4,
compare the
words created and made.
o In Gen c1 v1,
compare the
word created
with, in Gen c2 v4,
the word made.
So the verbs themselves are not generally reliable.
So, looking, instead:
at the pointed Gen c1 v26
& the
detailed Gen c2 v7,
we see that, conceptually, the Bible says that God:
created material
then he:
made things, out of that material.
|
|
|
.
|
|
If you’ve never heard of Andrew Wommack
then perhaps skip these last three cells of this section.
Hence I disagree with Andrew Wommack
(perhaps
see earlier section: INTRODUCTION)
when
he combines
the two concepts at the beginning of the previous cell,
and so ends up saying
“God spoke man
into existence”.
,
, See:
, , Atlanta,
Gospel Truth Seminar, 2009,
, , Friday – March 06, 2009
, , The Believer’s Authority- Evening
, , Part 3
, , at 1,
9, &
14, minutes.
, and:
, , Audio
teachings
, , LESSONS FROM THE CHRISTMAS STORY FOR EVERY SEASON
, , September 20, 2010
, , HOW TO CONCEIVE A MIRACLE
, , at 27
minutes. . . .
|
|
|
I
reckon there are three reasons
why Andrew mistakenly said:
“God spoke man
into existence”:
1) True,
the material we are made of
was spoken into
existence.
But that’s not the same
as
us being spoken into existence.
2) True,
we have some things in common with
Jesus:
o He is eternal, we are eternal.
o Jesus
was begotten, Luke c1 v35, like
us,
even though
he was also
spoken into
existence John c1 v14.
But Andrew wrongly
concluded, from these two,
that we, like Jesus, were spoken into
existence.
3) True,
for us believers to cause a miracle
we have only to:
speak, with faith, in Jesus’
name. Acts c3 v16
But Andrew wrongly
concluded, from this, that:
God had only to speak
to bring us into existence.
The truth is:
Gen c2 v7:
And the LORD God formed man
of the dust of the ground,
and
breathed into his nostrils the breath of life;
and
man became a living soul. KJV
|
|
|
Perhaps see later sections: THE
VIRGIN BIRTH
and immediately after it:
THE WORDS THAT THE FATHER CONTRIBUTED
FOR THE CONCEPTION OF JESUS,,,,,,
for another, similar, disagreement
that I have with Andrew
Though, as I wrote, in earlier section: INTRODUCTION:
So
strongly do I approve of the rest of Andrew’s teaching
that I have zero passion for disagreeing with him.
|
|
|
.
|
|
THE
IMPORTANCE OF
THE GARDEN OF EDEN
|
|
|
From now on I’ll write as if
Adam & Eve, and the garden of Eden, were real.
|
|
|
God made an imperfect universe
except for part of the universe
which he miraculously tweaked
to be a perfect garden.
The word ‘garden’ implies a cordoned off area:
a perfect part of the environment, with no large or dangerous animals.
The garden contained:
The
tree of knowledge of good & evil
which we humans,
Adam & Eve,
were not allowed to eat from
but did eat from.
And the tree of life:
which
we humans, Adam & Eve,
were allowed to eat from
but never got around to eating from.
We
were already eternal.
But the fruit of
the tree of life would have made us
eternal and substantial
(i.e. not like a ghost: Gen c3 v22).
|
|
|
Satan, who visited the garden, like God
did,
encouraged us humans, Adam &
Eve,
to eat from the tree of knowledge
of good & evil.
We, Adam & Eve, succumbed, ate
from it,
and so we changed:
From being innocent
& unworldly.
To being
guilty & worldly
with the potential for
more & for greater evil.
|
|
|
So
God had no choice
but to get us away from the tree
of life.
God did
this by ejecting Adam & Eve
from the Garden of Eden
into the outside,
not-miraculously-tweaked,
second-class,
environment. Gen c3 v23-24,
, , ,
|
|
|
.
|
|
SO, WHERE IS THE GARDEN OF EDEN NOW?
|
|
|
(I’ll continue to write as if Adam & Eve
and the garden of Eden were real.)
You may ask:
“So, where is the garden of
Eden now?”
I say:
“We are Adam’s ancestors.
So
we are the ones the garden of Eden
is defended against.
So it’s not surprising we
can’t see it.
Gen c3 v24:
So
he [God]
drove out the man;
and he placed at the east of the garden of Eden
Cherubims [powerful angels],
and a flaming sword which turned
every way,
to keep the way of the
tree of life. KJV
|
|
|
Rather than leave Cherubims and a
flaming sword
God must have found a less visible solution.”
|
|
|
.
|
|
WHAT’S
WRONG WITH A
VISIBLE SOLUTION?
|
|
|
In
these New Testament times God the Father hides:
He wants us to need faith
that he exists.
Faith and hiding are two
sides of the same coin.
You can’t have one without
the other.
|
|
|
There are basically two reasons why God the
Father
currently hides from us.
1) Because the Father
(with his angels & his
Spirit doing his bidding)
is:
absolutely constructive
absolutely powerful
absolutely
knowledgeable
absolutely intelligent
highly emotional
& fast.
If someone gets near
him
the Father has no
reason, in himself, without the Son,
to stop himself
from immediately:
empowering them
to change themselves to perfection
or rejecting them
if they don’t want to change.
,
, , , , Perhaps see second cell
, , , , of later section: SON & SPIRIT and the link within
it.
, , , , (This link does not
open a new tab.)
|
|
|
.
|
|
|
As
well as the Father currently
hiding,
the Spirit also currently hides (by being invisible).
The Son also currently hides
(he was here, but he’s not
here now).
Satan and his underling demons currently
hide
because:
o They can
be more destructive,
express
themselves more, ‘live’ more,
if they are not
just invisible
but undetectable.
o They have
no bodies anyway.
,
, , , Perhaps see later
section: SATAN LIKES IT HERE, , , ,
|
|
|
You
may ask:
“In these New Testament
times,
this Church Age we’re
in,
why does the triune God
make all of himself
invisible to us, tie
his hands behind his back,
give himself the same
limitations as the other players?”
I say:
“So that the war would be
a war of words and not of swords
(well, on God’s part
anyway).
For the gospel (the
almost too good to be true news
of Jesus being
willingly Punished in our place)
is made of words.
Without those words
there can be no
belief in those
words. Rom c10 v13-15,
Indeed, so that it’s a
war of words & not of swords
for only humans
and not for God or angels.”
Acts c10:
An
angel told Cornelius to visit Peter
so that Peter
could tell the gospel to Cornelius.
But the angel
himself
did not tell the
gospel to Cornelius. my abbn
(God also made it a war
down here
instead of in Heaven.)
, , , Perhaps see later webpage: The two dimensions. ,,,,,
|
|
|
.
|
|
|
2) The
second reason the Father currently hides from us
is that you cannot un-hear
something:
Let’s say that
the Father:
through
the Spirit
(&/or
through Jesus’ words in the gospels),
told you to do
something
but you decided you ‘weren’t ready for it
yet’
so you silently
refused.
Later, the
thought that:
the Loving
Almighty had spoken to you
but you had
refused,
would have a bad
effect on you.
It would set you
back.
It’s no way to
start or run such a relationship.
|
|
|
Hence,
if the Father asked you to do something,
and you actually argued with him,
he may well immediately
cave in.
He’d either
ask his second choice to do plan A
or he’d go
to plan B.
Or he’d
simply be waiting:
because
he can foresee that you will
see why he asked you
&
so change your mind.
|
|
|
.
|
|
The above are the two reasons
why God hides himself.
How God hides himself
is that he made the universe
so that it appears to be an accident,
appears to have a random, non-deliberate, design.
|
|
|
.
|
|
Home page
|
Next webpage:
Evidence
that animals cannot evolve
to become humans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|