The law
|
|
THE TWO ACCOUNTS
|
|
Most of us have, to some degree,
done wrong to others.
0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
Most of us have also got angry
at wrongs done to us & to others.
God rarely gets involved in human affairs.
But he has opinions on all of them.
And his standards are high, indeed perfect.
Perhaps see the two Bible texts later section:
BUT,
INSTEAD, FIRST OF ALL, JESUS SEEMED TO MAGNIFY JEWISH LAWS.,,,,,
Hence all our wrongs against each other
also offend our designer & maker.
All our wrongs against each other
are also sins.
|
|
Hence, technically
speaking, we each have two
accounts:
1. Our
horizontal account, with the world:
a debt of – social/cultural/civil/civil/legal wrongs.
2. Our
vertical account, with God:
a debt of – sins.
Our social/cultural/civil/legal wrongs are against people.
Our sins
are
against God.
|
|
But, two-thousand years ago,
God settled all our
with-him accounts
using his Son’s willing self-sacrifice in our place.
So, now, our sins do not exist.
So, now, God cannot see them.
So our social/cultural/civil/civil/legal wrongs still exist,
but our sins do not exist.
But do you believe it
and do you believe it applies to you?
Or do you insist on keeping your
own righteousness?
, Hence, technically
speaking, the sinner’s prayer is wrong:
, , It should not be:
, , , God, please Forgive me for my sins.
, , It should be:
, , , God, thank you for having already Forgiven
, , , all of us, all of our sins, via the Cross.
, , , I am one of those who believes it.
|
|
You might say:
“Sins no longer exist in God’s
eyes.
But surely they still exist in our eyes.”
I say:
“Sin is a word for God’s purposes only.
, Perhaps see later
section: SINS ARE DIGITAL, NOT ANALOGUE, AND ARE GOD’S MEASURE.
What we call sins
are usually social/cultural/civil/legal
wrongs.
But I’ll still often use the
word sin
as indeed the New Testament often
does.”
|
|
Sins
are:
always wrong, never right,
usually bad, rarely good.
Wrongs are, likewise:
always wrong, never right,
usually bad, rarely good.
Perhaps see earlier
section:
GOOD & BAD,
RIGHT & WRONG. , , , , ,
|
|
.
|
|
|
Your (or my)
horizontal, with-the-world, account
is made of four sets of accounts:
1) Family
& friends:
social law . . .
. money/work/favour
. . owed to/by you.
2) Rest
of society:
cultural law . . money/work/favour . . owed
to/by you.
3) Business:
civil law . . . .
. money/work/favour
. . owed to/by you.
4) Government:
criminal law . . imprisonment/money
. . owed to/by you.
|
|
|
.
|
|
|
Human punishments for doing wrong
and God’s punishment for sinning
differ:
Jesus’ Punishment in our
place
was due to our sins.
,, ,, Vertical. Perhaps see earlier
webpage: How God Forgave us all.,,,
Jesus Punishment in our
place
was not due to our
social/cultural/civil/legal wrongs.
,, ,, Horizontal. Perhaps again see above webpage.
The difference shows that:
our social/cultural/civil/legal wrongs
and
our sins
are parts of two, different,
separate, accounts.
Hence the criminal on the other cross,
despite being the first Christian into Heaven,
remained on his cross. Luke c23 v39-43
Hence also, ‘sin’ is not a legal
word
or a human-cultural word.
You won’t find it in a western court of law
or in secular conversation.
|
|
|
The gospel is the good news
that Jesus was Punished in place of all of us:
His Punishment made all our sins (before God) vanish
even though all our wrongs (before each other) remain.
, , Perhaps see earlier section: WHY
WAS JESUS EXECUTED? , , .
|
|
.
|
|
|
You
become a Christian:
not when you only know the gospel, in your mind,
but when you also believe the gospel, in your heart/spirit.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,Rom c10 v10
On believing – your heart/spirit becomes grateful
and so renews your mind:
1) Duplicates its belief into your mind
so that even your
mind believes.
2) Establishes the pattern of that belief,
the pattern of
the gospel, agape love,
throughout your
mind,
then:
your heart/spirit
& your mind
& God’s
Spirit inside you
become alike,
then all three of you can
live & work together
without getting in each
other’s way
, , Blue text copied from earlier section:
, , WHAT
IS A RENEWED MIND? , , .
|
|
|
.
|
|
Our account
with the Father is a debt now settled,
a debt now paid.
But demons lie:
In the past
demons could truthfully accuse us of sins
and tell God
and rightly expect him to act.
Rev c12 v10:
ctd … for the accuser of our
brethren is cast down,
which accused them
before our God
day and night. KJV
But now, now that Jesus has
suffered in our place,
demons can, if they are
truthful, tell us
of only our wrongs,
not our sins.
Our sins no longer exist.
So they lie.
They encourage us to be
simple & sloppy
and to think that we each
have only one account:
a combination of:
our with-God
account
and our
with-each-other account.
Hence they are keen on justice.
|
|
Hence, for
example, to prevent/reduce/undo
healing &/or
deliverance,
they’ll remind you of some wrong you’ve
done
so as to trick you into being defensive:
making you think, even say,
that you did not do
that wrong. 1 John c1 v8-10
Hence, for that crucial
moment:
You forget, in your mind,
that God has put all of us right with himself.
Hence
belief remains active in your heart/spirit
but becomes
inactive in your mind.
, , , , Perhaps also see later section: UNBELIEF and its subsections
, , , , and
, , , , later section: SIN
CONSCIOUSNESS. ,,,,,
|
|
Likewise,
to prevent/reduce/undo healing,
they’ll remind you of some
wrong done to you.
Though they’ll not also remind you
that, collectively, it’s all our fault:
We, collectively,
isolated ourselves from God.
Even nature does
bad as well as good.
, , , , See earlier section: WHY IS THE UNIVERSE SECOND CLASS? .
Nor will demons remind you
that you’re dead to the
world,
remind you to forgive all
who hurt you,
remind you to be
constructive.
You’ll conclude
that God could have stopped
people hurting you,
but didn’t.
Hence, for that
crucial moment,
you don’t want
anything to do with God.
, , , , Perhaps see earlier section:
, , , , THE PROBLEM WITH BELIEVING THAT GOD STILL DOES BAD.
Hence, again,
belief remains active in your heart/spirit
but becomes
inactive in your mind.
|
|
|
.
|
|
All
this is intuitive for demons:
They don’t personally
know God’s Forgiveness.
But
they do see more than we do
so they know about
God’s Forgiveness.
They do know that
they have to prevent us
believing God’s Forgiveness
if they are to
continue ‘living’.
, , , , See earlier sections: WE ARE PLAYGROUNDS
, , , , and
, , , , SATAN LIKES IT HERE
, , , , and first four cells
of
, , , , later section: THE BASIC MECHANICES
, , , , and
, , , , later section: ANOTHER EXAMPLE:
TEMPTATIONS.
|
|
|
.
|
|
CONCLUSION TO
THE TWO ACCOUNTS
|
|
Technically
speaking sins no longer exist.
Whatever you are guilty of before people
you are no longer guilty of before God.
The Cross enabled God to give us his Holy
Spirit.
You
believing that the Cross was for you
enables you to receive God’s Holy Spirit.
You renewing your mind enables God’s Spirit
to live in you without you
disagreeing with him.
And that enables you to
command miracles, in Jesus’ name,
despite you having, in the
past, committed
social/cultural/civil/legal wrongs.
, , Perhaps earlier webpage: Christian healing leaflet. , , ,
|
|
Hence you can become covered with God’s glory (vertical)
while still being covered with human shame
(horizontal).
Even though Paul had killed Christians …
Acts c6 v1 – c9 v2 Acts c22 v4,
Acts c22 v19-20 1 Cor c15 v9,
…
he now believed the gospel, had
renewed his mind,
and so did miracles.
Acts c14 v3 Acts c16 v16-40 Acts c19 v11-12,
Acts c20 v7-12 Acts c28 v1-6 Acts c28 v7-9,
, , Perhaps also see first cell
, , of earlier section: THE GUILT WE FEEL
, , and see
, , later section: GOD’S GLORIOUS SPIRIT IS IN YOU. , , ,
|
|
|
.
|
|
JESUS’
PUNISHMENT
WAS A LEGAL MATTER
|
|
The Bible often says that:
Jesus was Punished for our sins. actions/verbs/processes
,, 1
Cor c15 v3 Gal
c1 v4 Heb
c1 v3 1
Pet c2 v24 1
John c1 v7 etc
And this communicates the gospel perfectly
to the common man:
actions are indeed a fair
measure
of the structure that
produced them.
|
|
But, technically
speaking:
it was our bad points objects/nouns/structures
that produce our sins actions/verbs/processes
that Jesus
was Punished for.
Jesus was Punished in our place. Matt
c20 v28, , .
|
|
.
|
|
Hence:
Just as:
Jesus did not take our sicknesses,
he took our place
so also:
Jesus did not take our sins,
he took our place.
,, ,, Third & fourth lines, of
this cell,
,, ,, are copied from fourth cell of
earlier section:
,, ,, THE COMPONENTS OF JESUS’
PUNISHMENT.,,,,,
|
|
|
.
|
|
THE LAMB
OR THE SCAPEGOAT
|
|
In both Old
Testament and New Testament
there are two descriptions of Jesus:
S) Sacrifice
actions/verbs/processes
for sins actions/verbs/processes.
R)
Receptacle objects/nouns/structures for sins objects/nouns/structures.
|
|
In the Old
Testament:
S)
Flawless sacrificial lamb. Exo c12
& c29 v38-41
Isa c53 v7
R)
Scapegoat: symbolically given sins, then sent away. Lev c16
In the New Testament:
S)
Jesus: Sinless sacrifice. John c1 v29-36
1 Pet c1 v18-19
R)
Jesus: taker of our sins & sickness.
Matt c8 v16-17
1 Pet c2 v24 .
|
|
|
.
|
|
TESTAMENTS AND COVENANTS
|
|
The Bible is divided into Old Testament
& New Testament.
In the Old Testament:
the Old
Covenant
is a deal from God.
In the New Testament:
the New Covenant
is
a gift from God.
|
|
A covenant:
is an unconditional
promise
where the other side has no say.
A biblical covenant:
is an unconditional promise,
made by God,
where the other side has no say.
The Old Covenant, to Israel, has ended.
The New Covenant, to everyone, is still active.
The Old
Covenant was:
A set of
conditional promises
from God, to all
Jews,
that he will
reward, or punish,
individuals, or
the whole nation,
depending on
whether they obey his laws.
The New Covenant is:
A conditional
gift,
from God, to all
humans,
of his Son’s
righteousness (so discard your own)
& of every
good thing in this life
& of eternal
life in the next,
depending on
whether you believe in the Son.
|
|
,, ,, ,, ,, Demons
believe everything about the Son, Jam c2 v14-20,
,, ,, ,, ,, but don’t
believe in the Son
,, ,, ,, ,, (e.g.
they’ll never want to do what’s right).
|
|
|
.
|
|
THE OLD COVENANT
(THE JEWS’ ACCOUNT WITH GOD)
|
|
The Bible is in two parts:
first the Old Covenant (about ¾ of the Bible)
then the New Covenant (about ¼ of the Bible).
The New Covenant contains:
The phrase New Covenant,
but, perhaps surprisingly, not the
phrase Old Covenant.
In it, the Old Covenant is instead called the law.
To clarify that I’m talking about
this law,
and not, say, secular law,
I’ll often call it Jewish law or Jewish laws.
|
|
The
era of Jewish laws lasted:
from:
1,500bc approx (when God gave Jewish laws to the
Jews)
to:
33ad (when Jesus died & rose, and God gave
us his Spirit).
To begin with, in 1900bc approx, God
made the Jews.
, Perhaps see third cell (starting: Then
God made the Jews)
, of earlier section THE PRE-CHURCH AGE (OLD TESTAMENT TIMES).
Then, from 1500bc approx to 33ad,
God
gave the Jews laws, Jewish laws.
Or, to be precise,
began imposing Jewish laws on the Jews.
, Perhaps see:
Exodus, Leviticus, & Deuteronomy.
On the face of it:
God
gave Jewish laws to the Jews because:
having rescued them from
slavery in Egypt,
& while taking them to
the good land he’d promised them,
some of them were
complaining, mistrustful, rebellious,
even after each miracle God
did for them.
, , Perhaps
see: Exo
c1 – c19 and Exo
c32.
But a second reason God gave the
Jews Jewish laws
was that some of the laws were
predictive signs,
signs that foreshadowed the New
Covenant to come.
, Perhaps see
later section:
, SOME OLD COVENANT LAWS SERVE AS SIGNS,
SHADOWS,
,, OF THE NEW COVENANT., , .
|
|
.
|
|
It
was virtually impossible to keep all
Jewish laws
(hence there was also a system of sacrifices).
And the consequences of breaking just one law
were as bad as if you had broken all the laws
(it’s all to do with holiness,
being perfect in the face of a perfect God).
James
writes:
Jam c2 v10:
For whosoever
shall keep the whole law,
and yet offend in one point,
he is guilty of all. KJV
And
Paul’s statement:
Gal c3 v10
(Gal c5 v3):
ctd … for it is written, Cursed is
every one
that continueth not
in all things which are
written in the book of the law
to do them. KJV
refers back to:
Deut c27 v26 c27 v26:
Cursed
be he that confirmeth not
all the words of this law
to do them … ctd KJV
|
|
.
|
|
Interestingly, the verse:
Deut c28 v15:
But it shall come to
pass, if thou wilt not hearken unto
the voice of the LORD thy
God,
to observe to do all his
commandments
and his statutes which I
command thee this day;
that all these curses shall
come upon thee,
and overtake thee: KJV,
plus:
the list of punishments
in: Deut c28 v16-68 c28 v16-68
would have proven
Paul’s point for him better.
, , Paul’s point
being: Forgiveness is better than Jewish laws.
, , Perhaps glance back at earlier webpages:
, , The four reasons Paul preached only
Forgiveness
, , and:
, , God, through Paul,
changed the meaning of the word ‘righteousness’.
But Paul did not choose Deut c28 c28.
Instead he chose Deut c27 c27.,,,
|
|
I
reckon he chose Deut c27 c28
rather than Deut c28 c28
because:
Deut
c27 v26 c27 v26
is about God gives punishments
to individuals.
So it’s in keeping with the individual nature of Forgiveness.
,, ,, (As it
happens, it’s also in keeping with the individual nature of Judgment too.)
However, the
Jewish laws, in Deut c28 c28, not only include:
God gives individual punishments to individuals,
but also include:
God gives general punishments to all Jews
for disobeying
him, Deut c28 v15-68 c28 v15-68
&:
God gives general rewards to all Jews
for obeying him, Deut c28 v1-14 c28 v1-14.,,,
|
|
Paul
wanted to avoid the last scripture (red text, above)
because it supports Judgment.
Hence Paul avoided:
God gives general punishments to all Jews
for disobeying him, Deut c28 v15-68 c28 v15-68
because it’s immediately after:
God gives general rewards to all Jews
for obeying him, Deut c28 v1-14 c28 v1-14.,,,
|
|
.
|
|
In the Old Testament
the Jews treated their lawbreakers in two ways:
punishment – of the human,
animal sacrifice – the human
provides a sacrificial animal.
Regarding animal sacrifices:
The priest inspected the
animal, but not the owner:
did not ask the owner about
the sin they’d committed.
It was the animal that had
to be perfect, flawless.
The animal sacrifice then
made the owner blameless.
(Though not sinless. It merely covered the sin. Heb c10 v1-21), , , ,
|
|
The Old Covenant flawlessness of
the animal
foreshadowed the New
Covenant principle
that Jesus must never have
broken any Jewish law.
(Indeed, must never have sinned,
however small the sin.)
Conversely, backwards
engineering:
The
Father knew that, in the future,
his Son would take our
place.
So, in the past, the
Father deliberately demanded
that only flawless
animals be sacrificed.
|
|
|
.
|
|
JEWISH
LAWS
ARE NOT FOR GENTILES
|
|
You may say:
“Surely, we’re supposed to obey Jewish laws
because it was God who gave them to us.
I say:
“God gave Jewish laws (&
punishments & sacrifices)
to only the Jews, not to
gentiles.
God intends gentiles to
read Jewish laws, read the Old Covenant.
For the New
Covenant
needs the Old Covenant
in order to make
sense of it.
(Likewise, the
New Testament
needs the Old Testament
in order to make
sense of it.)
But God intends gentiles to
only read Jewish laws, the Old Covenant.
Not to enter into the Old
Covenant,
in any way, to any degree.”
, , A gentile is anyone who is not a Jew.
, , N.B. The Creator’s Son is a Jew.
, , Very nearly all of the Bible was written by
Jews.
|
|
|
.
|
|
The Bible is divided into Old Testament
& New Testament.
In the Old Testament:
the Old
Covenant
is a deal from God.
In
the New Testament:
the New Covenant
is
a gift from God.
We gentile Christians, despite
being gentiles,
should nevertheless read the Old Testament
because:
the New Testament . . was built
on . . the Old Testament
&
the
New Covenant . . . replaced . . . . . the Old Covenant.
Heb c8 v13:
In that he saith,
A new covenant,
he hath made the first old.
Now that which
decayeth and waxeth old
is ready to vanish away.
The
Old Covenant was:
A set of
conditional promises
from God, to all
Jews,
that he will
reward, or punish,
individuals, or
the whole nation,
depending on
whether they obey his laws.
The New Covenant is:
A conditional
gift,
from God, to all
humans,
of his Son’s
righteousness (so discard your own)
& of every
good thing in this life
& of eternal
life in the next,
depending on
whether you believe in the Son.
|
|
We gentile Christians (unlike Old Testament
Jews)
don’t have any laws:
Acts c15 v28-29:
For it seemed good to the
Holy Ghost, and to us,
to lay upon you no greater burden
than these necessary things;
That ye abstain from
meats offered to idols,
and from blood,
and from things
strangled,
and from fornication:
from which if ye keep yourselves,
ye shall do well. Fare ye
well. KJV
The last line shows that the five lines before it
are not laws but good advice:
advice to changed people:
people who now want to do right & not wrong.
|
|
Jesus seemed
to give Christians
a law/commandment:
John c13 v34-35:
A new commandment
I [Jesus]
give unto you,
That ye love one
another;
as I have loved you,
that ye also love one another.
By this shall all men know that ye are my disciples,
if ye have love one to another. KJV
But, actually, this new commandment
is not a law/commandment
but self-expression.
Keeping it is not a cause of us being right with God
(as it is with the Old
Covenant),
it is an effect.
An effect of Jesus
having
put all of us right with God
and of you believing it.
|
|
|
.
|
|
YOU MAY COMPLAIN
|
|
You may complain:
“But the epistles contain
instructions & rebukes.”
I say:
“Paul (& the other apostles) did
not express their hearts
in instructions & rebukes.
They expressed their hearts in such texts as:
1 Cor c13 NIV:
Above all else, love people.
my abbreviation
|
|
However,
reports, from distant churches, of ‘believers’:
o Working
proudly to be right with God.
o Accepting sexual immorality as normal.
o Etc.
prompted the apostles to write
epistles
that contained instructions & rebukes.
I write people
who don’t (yet) believe all Jesus said,
, who are not (yet)
believers, but think they are,
, as ‘believers’.
They were exasperated. What else could they do?
Paul for example, had to meet
those people
on the level they were at.
1 Cor c3 v1:
And I, brethren, could not speak unto you
as unto spiritual,
but as unto
carnal, even as unto babes in Christ.
KJV
Paul gave them the
stick
because they hadn’t
(yet)
accepted the
carrot. 1 Cor c4 v14-21, ,
|
|
I
reckon Paul could have added:
You don’t yet
believe. Not in your hearts.
So don’t even call yourselves
believers yet.
Believers want
to do what’s right.
They also know
what’s right
because they hear
God.
But I had to send
you instructions.”
|
|
|
.
|
|
JESUS
DID NOT ABOLISH JEWISH LAWS …
|
|
Jesus did not abolish Jewish laws.
Matt c5 v18:
For verily I say unto
you,
Till heaven and
earth pass,
one jot or one
tittle
shall in no wise pass
from the law … ctd KJV
|
|
|
.
|
|
… BUT, INSTEAD, FIRST OF
ALL,
JESUS SEEMED TO MAGNIFY JEWISH LAWS
…
|
|
Jesus seemed
to magnify Jewish laws,
seemed to speak of changes
that God wanted to make:
Matt c5 v21-22:
Ye have heard that it was said by them of old time,
Thou shalt not kill;
and whosoever shall kill
shall be in danger of
the judgment:
But I say unto you,
That whosoever is angry with his brother
without a cause
shall be in danger of the judgment:
and whosoever shall say to his brother, Raca,
shall be in danger of the council:
but whosoever shall say, Thou fool,
shall be in danger of hell fire. KJV
Matt c5 v27-28:
Ye have heard that it was said by them of old time,
Thou shalt not commit adultery:
But I say unto you,
That whosoever looketh on a woman
to lust after her
hath committed adultery with her already
in his heart. KJV
|
|
However, Jesus only seemed to magnify Jewish laws.
Jewish laws were, in fact, already
strong.
It’s just that, over the centuries,
people had verbally weakened
the application of written Jewish laws.
See the first line of each
of the above two Bible texts.
Then see:
CARM’s Does the Old Testament
, , teach to hate
your enemies?. ,,,,,
|
|
|
.
|
|
… THEN
JESUS FULFILLED JEWISH LAWS …
|
|
Jesus told his fellow Jews to keep the Jewish laws:
Matt c5 v17-19:
Think not that I am come
to destroy
the law, or the prophets:
I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.
For verily I say unto
you,
Till heaven and earth pass,
one jot or one tittle
shall in no wise
pass from the law,
till all be fulfilled.
Whosoever therefore
shall break one
of these least commandments,
and shall teach men so,
he shall be called
the least in the kingdom of heaven:
but whosoever
shall do
and teach them,
the same shall be
called
great in the kingdom of
heaven. KJV
It’s clear that Jesus was
addressing only Jews
by the verses that follow, Matt c5 v20-24.,,,
, , Also see fourth cell
, , (starting Jesus told his disciples to pray the Lord’s
prayer)
, , of earlier section: THE LORD’S PRAYER.
|
|
Then, just like:
breaking Jewish laws led to
punishment
or required a perfect animal
to be a sacrifice,
so also:
Jesus allowed himself
to be both punished
and be a sacrifice
for all the sins that the
Jews
had committed, were
committing, and will commit.
|
|
Hence it was vital that Jesus had kept all Jewish laws,
had not broken any:
Otherwise he
would not have been
the perfect
sacrifice he needed to be:
Gal c4 v4-5:
But when the fullness of the time came,
God sent forth
his Son,
made of a
woman, made under the law,
to redeem them
that were under the law,
that we might
receive the adoption as sons. KJV
, , , , The last line includes word
might
, , , , because it’s up to us
, , , , as well as up to God.
, , , , Perhaps see later webpage:
, , , , WE CHOOSE WHERE WE
GO – BY FORGIVENESS. , , ,
|
|
.
|
|
Mind you, Jesus did break wrong application of Jewish laws:
wrong application – produced by wrong motivation.
Matt c12 v1-7 (Mark c2 v23-28) my abbreviation:
Jesus & his disciples
were hungry.
So they picked corn, on the
sabbath, to eat.
Some Pharisees accused them of working on the sabbath.
But Jesus said that
king David once did a similar thing
, , [and no Pharisee criticises king David].
Then Jesus added:
“God wants mercy, not sacrifice” [quoted from Hos c6 v6]
in order to show that
the Pharisees’ application
was wrong. my abbn
, , Their application was wrong
, , because Hos c6 v6 contradicts
earlier sacrificial laws.
, , God’s relationship with the Jews had started to change even by
Hosea’s time.
, , See later section:
, , GOD DOES NOT CHANGE
, , BUT HIS RELATIONSHIP WITH US CHANGES.
And Jesus completely rejects
any added, so-called, laws:
Matt c15 v1-20 Mark c7 v1-23:
Jesus angrily points out
that wicked or misled
religious leaders
fool the people
by replacing the right laws
of God
with shallow, even
wrong, merely human, laws.
Probably only to make
themselves look good. my abbn
|
|
|
.
|
|
… THEN, JESUS SUFFERED & DIED
FOR EVERYONE.
|
|
Jesus’ self-sacrifice was a fulfilment of Jewish law:
Yet it was not a Jewish sacrifice.
, , It was not the way a lamb would be sacrificed under Jewish
law. Lev
c3 v7-11
Nor
was it a Jewish punishment.
, , It was not a Jewish stoning then hanging the body on a
tree. Deut
c21 v22
It
was a punishment of the Roman Empire.
In effect – an international punishment.
|
|
To the above, add:
Acts c10 my abbreviation:
An angel, in a vision,
told Cornelius, a
God-fearing Roman centurion,
to send some men to get
Peter.
Meanwhile God showed Peter,
in a trance,
a stretched out sheet of
religiously unclean animals
and told him to kill &
eat (Peter was hungry).
Peter refused.
God said: “Don’t call anything unclean
that I have made clean”.
This whole argument repeated
two more times.
Then Peter came out of the
trance
and God’s Spirit said to him
“You have visitors. Go with them.”
They all went to Cornelius’
house
where Cornelius then spoke
of his vision of an angel.
Then Peter finally
understood his trance:
that Jesus’ crucifixion
and God’s Spirit
were for, not only
Jews,
but for everyone. my abbreviation
and we see that Jesus was Punished for,
was a sacrifice for, everyone.
|
|
John c3 v14-18:
And as Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness,
even so must the Son of man
be lifted up:
that whosoever
believeth in him
should not perish, but have
eternal life.
For God so loved the world,
that he gave his only
begotten Son,
that whosoever believeth in
him should not perish,
but have everlasting life.
For God sent not his Son
into the world to condemn the world;
but that the world through
him might be saved.
He that believeth on him is
not condemned:
but he that believeth not is
condemned already,
because he hath not believed
in
the name of the only
begotten Son of God. KJV
, , Believed, that is,
after the gospel (this text is one form of the gospel)
, , has been
presented. Ideally presented
convincingly, i.e. with miracles.
|
|
|
.
|
|
CONCLUSION:
HOW IT ALL WORKS
|
|
Some Old Covenant laws are of the culture of
their day
so they don’t even make sense any more.
For example:
Lev c14 v32-57:
Complex
instructions for getting rid of mould
on the walls in your
home. my
abbreviation
,, ,, ,, (They assumed it caused leprosy.)
But, even if the Jews of old
had been allowed to ignore such laws,
keeping the rest of them
would still have been virtually impossible.
Perhaps see third cell (starting: It
was virtually impossible to keep all Jewish laws)
of earlier section THE OLD COVENANT (THE JEWS’ ACCOUNT WITH GOD).
Hence, as well as giving the Jews laws,
God gave them:
punishments for the lawbreaker
&:
sacrifices that the lawbreaker needed to make.
|
|
Two thousand years ago
God let his Son be Punished
in place of the rest of us.
Hence, now,
anyone can break any, still
right, Old Covenant law,
yet not be in trouble with God.
But believers, if they’ve
renewed their minds,
don’t want to break any,
still right, Old Covenant law.
,, ,, Perhaps see earlier section:
,, ,, THIS APPARENT MISUNDERSTANDING IS NO ACCIDENT.
Believers who have renewed their minds
are grateful:
for Heaven to come
and God’s Spirit &
blessings now.
Hence believers are constructive:
forgive everyone who’s wronged them,
love everyone,
keep all, still right, Old Covenant laws – without effort,
indeed do all natural good – without effort,
indeed do miracles – without effort.
It’s all self-expression.
|
|
|
.
|
|
THE NEW
REPLACES THE OLD
|
|
The New Covenant replaces the Old Covenant:
Heb c8 v8-13:
For finding fault with them, he saith,
Behold, the days come, saith the Lord,
when I will make a new covenant with the house of
Israel
and with the house of Judah:
not according to the covenant that I made
with their fathers
in the day when I took them by the hand
to lead them out of the land of Egypt;
because they continued not in my covenant,
and I regarded them not,
saith the Lord.
For this is the covenant
that I will make with the house of Israel
after those days, saith the Lord;
I will put my laws into their mind,
and write them in their hearts:
and I will be to them a God,
and they shall be to me a people:
and they shall not teach every man his neighbour,
and every man his brother,
saying,
Know the Lord:
for all shall know me,
from the least to the greatest.
For I will be merciful to their unrighteousness,
and their sins and their iniquities
will I
remember no more.
In that he saith,
A new covenant,
he hath made the first old.
Now that which decayeth and waxeth old
is ready to
vanish away. KJV
, , Perhaps see second
cell
, , of earlier section: JEWISH
LAWS ARE NOT FOR GENTILES.
|
|
The commandment contained in the new covenant
replaces
the commandments contained in the old covenant.
John c13 v34-35:
A
new commandment
I
[Jesus] give unto you,
That
ye love one another;
as
I have loved you, that ye also love one another.
By
this shall all men
know that ye are my disciples,
if
ye have love one to another. KJV
|
|
Jesus’ new commandment, above,
is extreme.
He commands the same level
of love between believers
as he had for believers,
strong agape love,
to the death love.
Hence Jesus’ new commandment:
is something you:
must want to do
with both soul and heart/spirit:
complete
self-expression.
Not
something you:
merely obey
with only your
soul.
|
|
Indeed,
Jesus taught us
to love everyone.
, , Perhaps see earlier section: LOVE YOUR ENEMIES.
And loving includes
forgiving.
, , Perhaps see earlier section: FORGIVE US AS WE.
And loving & forgiving
everyone
means that Jesus’ new
commandment
includes all Jewish laws:
Rom c13 v8-10
Gal c5 v14:
Loving
everyone
means that you
are also keeping
all Jewish laws. my abbreviation
|
|
So, actually,
this new commandment
is not a law/commandment
but self-expression:
Keeping it is not
a cause of us being right with God
(as it is with
the Old Covenant),
it is an effect.
An effect of
Jesus having
put all of us right with God
and of you believing it.
|
|
|
.
|
|
I write people who don’t (yet) believe all Jesus said,
who
are not (yet) believers, but think they are,
as
‘believers’.
Some ‘believers’
try to:
Add: Jesus’ new commandment
to the Old Covenant, the Old
Testament commandments,
Then add: the Old
Covenant
to the New Covenant.
Then say: “That’s what a Christian needs to do”
(with the emphasis on ‘do’).
|
|
However:
the Old Covenant
cannot be added to:
the New Covenant
for the same reason that:
Gen c12 v3:
And I will
bless them that bless thee,
and curse him that
curseth thee
… ctd KJV
cannot be added to:
Eph c1 v3:
Blessed be the God and
Father of our Lord Jesus Christ,
who hath blessed us with all
spiritual blessings
in heavenly places in Christ: KJV
for the same reason that:
Jews, do this, – and you’ll
get a good thing from God,
Jews, do that, – and you’ll
get a bad thing from God,
cannot be added to:
God has already given all
good things to all of us.
|
|
Also,
The cause-&-effect is reversed:
The
Old Covenant is:
God
said: “Jews, do what’s
right & good
to humbly earn
good things
from me.”
The New Covenant is:
God said: “I’ve now given
everything good
to everyone,
so, out of
gratitude, do what’s right & good.
|
|
.
|
|
Jesus
said:
Matt c9 v10-17 Mark c2 v1 – c3 v6 Luke c5 v27 – c6 v11:
A
new unshrunk patch
cannot be sown onto an old
shrunk garment.
New wine cannot ferment
in used,
stretched, brittle, wineskins. my abbreviation
The above text is in Matt Mark Luke
but not in John.
Jesus’ new commandment is in John (John c13 v34-35)
but not in Matt Mark Luke.
Hence the above links, Matt Mark
Luke,
extend beyond the text.
I do this so as to reveal
that the overall subject is:
that Jesus’ new
commandment is better than
the old
commandments
indeed, that the
entire New Covenant is better than
the entire Old
Covenant:
Universal
personal: Forgiveness,
God’s
Spirit, a renewed mind,
blessings
& miracles, etc,
are
better than:
Jewish
national: laws,
sacrifices,
punishments,
blessings
& miracles, etc.
|
|
|
.
|
|
GOD DOES NOT CHANGE
BUT HIS RELATIONSHIP WITH US
CHANGES
|
|
God never changes.
Num
c23 v19 1
Sam c15 v29 Mal
c3 v6 Jam
c1 v17
He always thinks & does what’s right,
what’s most constructive in the long run.
, , Perhaps see earlier section:
, , GOOD & BAD, RIGHT & WRONG, , .
But his relationship with us changes.
, , Perhaps see first four sections
, , of earlier webpage: The Church Age
, ,
, , and perhaps see
, , earlier section: IN JESUS, THE FATHER REVEALS HIS HEART TO US, , .
|
|
.
|
|
1) The
first part of the Pre-Church Age (Old Testament times)
started when God made us.
His was a relationship
of love,
towards everything
& everyone.
|
|
2) The
second part of the Pre-Church Age (Old Testament times)
started when we humans, Adam &
Eve, started to do wrong.
Hence God kept us away from
the tree of life.
, , , We were already eternal.
, , , But the fruit of
the tree of life would have made us
, , , eternal and substantial (i.e. not
like a ghost: Gen
c3 v22). .
It was a time when:
God destroyed the earth with a flood
because of its
wickedness.
But then blessed righteous Noah & his sons.
Etc.
, , , , Perhaps see earlier
webpage: The good & bad that God does:
A relationship of love and justice
towards all humans.
|
|
3) The
third part of the Pre-Church Age (Old Testament times)
started when God made the Jews.
, Perhaps see third cell (starting: Then
God made the Jews)
, of earlier section THE PRE-CHURCH AGE (OLD TESTAMENT TIMES).
A relationship of love and justice
towards all Jews.
|
|
.
|
|
4) The first part of the Church Age
started when God changed his
relationship with the Jews
from:
a relationship of love and justice
towards all Jews
to:
a
relationship of love
towards all Jews.
The first part of the Church Age
splits into two time periods:
3 years: start of
Jesus’ ministry to Pentecost.
9 years approx:
Pentecost to Peter’s
vision. Acts c10,
It splits because:
Jesus was the first to preach Forgiveness,
Forgiveness first appears in the gospels.
Hence the gospels are New Testament.
But the gospels lack
Pentecost.
Hence the gospels are Old Covenant.
, , , Perhaps see earlier section:
, , , JESUS PREACHED BOTH
JUDGMENT & FORGIVENESS
, , , and earlier section:
, , , REWARDS &
PUNISHMENTS.
To conclude: the first part of the
Church Age was:
a relationship of love
towards all Jews.
|
|
5) The
second part of the Church Age
started when God said:
that Forgiveness, the
New Covenant,
included gentiles
(non-Jews) as well as Jews:
that everyone has been
Forgiven.
, Perhaps again see earlier section.
, THEN, JESUS SUFFERED & DIED FOR EVERYONE:
A relationship of love
towards all humans.
|
|
.
|
|
6) On
Judgment Day
, , , Perhaps again see earlier section:
, , , JESUS PREACHED BOTH
JUDGMENT & FORGIVENESS.
God
will change his relationship with us, for the last time,
to make it:
A relationship of love and justice
towards all humans.
|
|
|
.
|
|
, Perhaps again see
, first four sections
, of earlier webpage: The Church Age, , , ,
|
|
|
.
|
|
SOME OLD COVENANT LAWS
SERVE AS SIGNS, SHADOWS,
OF THE NEW COVENANT
|
|
When God gave the
Old Covenant laws to the Jews
he made some of the laws to be predictive signs
that foreshadowed the New Covenant to come.
Heb c10 v1-3:
For the law
having a shadow of good things to come,
and not the very image of the things,
can never with those sacrifices
which they offered year by year
continually
make the comers thereunto perfect.
For then
would they not have ceased to be offered?
because that the worshippers
once purged
should have had no more conscience of sins.
But in those sacrifices
there is a remembrance again made
of sins
every year.
KJV
Col c2 v16-17:
Let no man therefore
judge you
in meat, or in drink,
or in respect of an holyday, or of the
new moon,
or of the sabbath days:
which
are a shadow of things to come; … ctd KJV
|
|
|
.
|
|
The Old Covenant sabbath law
foreshadowed, gave significance to,
drew attention to, helped explain,
the New Covenant to
come:
Deut c5 v12-15:
Do
not work, indeed do virtually nothing,
on
Saturday, the actual sabbath day
. . . my abbn
Deut c28 (v1) (v15):
. . . in order to be blessed by God, not cursed .
. . my abbn
Exo c31 v14:
. . . and in order to not be put to death. my abbn
The sabbath law, above,
(which we are not supposed to obey)
foreshadowed,
gave significance to,
drew attention to,
helped explain,
the sabbath rest, below,
(which we should accept).
Heb c4 v9-11:
There remaineth
therefore a rest to the people of God.
For he that is entered into his rest,
he also hath ceased from his own works,
as God did
from his.
Let us labour therefore
to enter into that rest
… ctd. KJV
Matt c11 v28-30:
Come unto me, all ye
that labour and are heavy
laden,
and I will give you rest.
Take my yoke upon you, and learn of me;
for I am meek and lowly in heart:
and ye shall find rest unto your souls.
For my yoke is
easy, and my burden is light. KJV
, , , A yoke is the collar on a beast of burden (horse, ox)
, , , which is connected to the burden (cart, plough).
|
|
The Old Covenant tithing law
foreshadowed, gave significance to,
drew attention to, helped explain,
the New Covenant to
come:
Lev c27 v30-33:
And all the tithe of
the land,
whether of the seed of the
land,
or of the fruit of the
tree,
is the LORD'S: it is holy unto the LORD.
And if a man will
at all redeem ought of
his tithes,
he shall add
thereto the fifth part thereof.
And concerning the
tithe of the herd, or of the flock,
even of whatsoever passeth
under the rod,
the tenth shall
be holy unto the LORD.
He shall not
search whether it be good or bad,
neither shall he
change it: and if he change it at all,
then both it and
the change thereof
shall be holy; it
shall not be redeemed. KJV
, , , For more details
of the Old Covenant tithing law
, , , see: Num
c18 and: Mal
c3 v10-12
The tithing law, above,
(which we are not
supposed to obey)
foreshadowed, gave
significance to,
drew attention to,
helped explain,
Jesus’
promises, below,
(which we should
accept).
Matt c6 v33 (Luke c12 v31):
But seek ye first the kingdom of God,
and his righteousness;
and
all these things [i.e. all material necessities]
shall be added unto
you. KJV
Mark c10 v29-30 (Luke c18 v29-30):
And
Jesus answered and said,
Verily I say unto you,
There is no man that
hath left house, or brethren,
or sisters, or
father, or mother, or wife, or children,
or lands, for my
sake, and the gospel's,
but he shall receive
an hundredfold
now in this time,
houses, and brethren,
and sisters, and mothers,
and children, and
lands, … ctd KJV
Luke c6 v38:
Give, and it shall be
given unto you;
good measure,
pressed down,
and shaken
together, and running over,
shall men give
into your bosom.
For with the same
measure that ye mete withal
it shall be measured to
you again. KJV
|
|
.
|
|
SIGNS/SHADOWS,
OR THE REAL THING?
|
|
So, don’t do
the Old Covenant,
don’t do the signs/shadows.
Do the real thing,
believe Jesus.
Perhaps see earlier section:
CONTINUING
THE SON’S WORK.,,,,,
John c6
v28-29:
Then said they unto him,
What shall we do,
that we might work
the works of God?
Jesus answered and said unto
them,
This is the work of
God,
that ye believe
on him whom he
hath sent. KJV
This was Jesus’ entire answer.
Believe is all we need to do
(if you can call believing
doing).
|
|
Of course, you will also do things.
You won’t only believe.
Just make sure
that the things you do:
are an effect,
not a cause.
An effect of God having put all of us right with him.
Not you
trying to put yourself right
with him.
|
|
|
.
|
|
SO,
BEWARE OF THE OLD COVENANT
|
|
Perhaps see earlier
section: WHY BIBLICAL
TEACHER-HEALERS DO IT ,,,,,
and the remainder of that webpage.
In the province of Galatia
Paul had found
people who weren’t believers
but who thought they were
believers.
(I
call them ‘believers’)
They had accepted the preaching that,
to be right with God, you had to both:
believe in Jesus’ Punishment
in our place
and:
keep Jewish laws (i.e.
become a Jew).
Hence Paul wrote:
Gal c3 v3-5:
Are ye so foolish?
having begun in the Spirit,
are ye now made perfect by the flesh?
Have ye suffered so many things in vain?
if it
be yet in vain.
He
therefore that ministereth to you the Spirit,
and worketh miracles
among you,
doeth he it by the works of the law,
or by the hearing of faith? KJV
Gal c3 – c5:
God’s Law is bondage.
God’s Spirit is freedom. my abbreviation
Rom c3 v20:
Therefore by the deeds of the law
there shall no flesh be justified in his sight:
for by the law is the knowledge of sin. KJV
2 Cor c3:
The
law, including the Ten Commandments,
brings death.
But the Spirit
brings life. my abbreviation
|
|
You may say:
“Surely, we’re supposed to obey Jewish laws
because it was God who gave them to us.
I say:
“God
gave Jewish laws (& punishments & sacrifices)
to only the Jews, not to
gentiles.
God intends gentiles to
read Jewish laws, read the Old Covenant.
For the New
Covenant
needs the Old Covenant
in order to make
sense of it.
(Likewise, the
New Testament
needs the Old Testament
in order to make
sense of it.)
But God intends gentiles to
only read Jewish laws, the Old Covenant.
Not to enter into the Old
Covenant,
in any way, to any degree.
God gave Jewish laws to the
Jews because:
having rescued them
from slavery in Egypt,
& while taking them
to the good land he’d promised them,
some of them were
complaining, mistrustful, rebellious,
even after each miracle
God did for them.”
, , , Perhaps see: Exo
c1 – c19 and Exo
c32. ,,,,,
|
|
.
|
|
To conclude: God gave laws to the Jews
to try to mould their souls
(or,
to be precise, their minds within their souls)
to counteract the moulding effects of:
o our flesh and our earthly thinking,
o the earth, and the world we’ve built from
it,
o demons’ temptations.
Perhaps see later section:
THE EFFECT OF MANY
SUGGESTIONS: MOULDING.
God designed
the material of the universe
to be second class
, , , , See earlier section: WHY IS THE UNIVERSE SECOND CLASS?
, , , , and, immediately after it, first & second
cells of:
, , , , IN WHAT WAYS DID GOD MAKE THE UNIVERSE
SECOND CLASS?.
so
that it moulds the souls
, , , , Perhaps see next cell
(starting N.B. Jewish laws:)
of both humans and demons alike
, , , , , See first two cells of
later section: THE BASIC MECHANICS.
to be legally minded.
Hence souls tend to feel at home
here:
in this
everything-must-be-earned world
that’s built from
a competitive earth,
and to love all the:
I-can-manage-to-keep-these-laws-that-I-chose laws.
|
|
.
|
|
N.B.
Jewish laws:
do not finally mould
the soul
they only temporarily mould the soul:
to
counteract
the world, the flesh, &
demons
which, likewise
do not finally mould
the soul
they only temporarily mould the soul.
Only the heart/spirit:
finally moulds,
has the final say in
moulding,
the soul.
|
|
|
.
|
|
The Old Covenant
moulded Jews’ souls
using:
o man-administered, natural, animal
sacrifices
o man-administered, natural, human
punishments
o God-administered, supernatural, curses
o God-administered, supernatural, blessings.
, , Perhaps see: Deut
c28.
Notice that the above are only of this life.
The threat
of Hell, and the chance of Heaven,
are not in the Old
Covenant.
In
the Old Testament:
Hell (Hebrew: Sheol)
was not a place of punishment
but merely a
‘sleeping place’ for the dead.
Nor was Heaven a
place that you or I might go to
as a reward. It was only God’s & angels’ home.
|
|
.
|
|
When God gave the Old Covenant animal sacrifices to the Jews
he made some of the laws to be predictive signs
that foreshadowed Jesus’ crucifixion to
come.
The sacrifice of lambs
foreshadowed,
gave significance to,
drew attention to, helped explain,
Jesus’
crucifixion to come.
|
|
Hence,
in the Old Testament,
God initially gave the impression
that he needed animal sacrifices.
But, later, he had to admit
that he didn’t actually need animal sacrifices:
Psalm 50 v7-15:
God says “I
want a word with you.
I don’t reject
your sacrifices.
But I don’t
actually need bulls and goats.
I made
everything, it’s all mine.
So don’t think you’re
actually giving me anything.
Instead, offer
your sacrifices,
then call on me when
you are in trouble
and I will rescue you
and you will honour me.” my abbreviation
|
|
And later still, in the New Testament,
God, through Paul, wrote:
Heb
c10 v4:
For it
is not possible
that the blood of bulls
and of goats
should take away sins. KJV
Jesus, of course, was not
an animal,
he was (& is) a
cross between God and a human.
That’s why his
self-sacrifice worked
whereas animal
sacrifices would never have worked.
,, ,, ,, Perhaps see earlier webpage: Gospel leaflet.,,,
(God designed the
material of the universe
to have limited
resources.
, , Perhaps see first two cells
, , of earlier section: EVOLUTION OF PLANTS & ANIMALS.,,,
Hence we’d see buying
as an important/vital
function in life.
Even the buying of
God’s favours.)
|
|
|
.
|
|
To conclude:
The Old
Covenant worked in an earthly way.
Not in an eternal way
– like the New Covenant:
The Old Covenant:
Does
not have Judgment
(nor Forgiveness
for that matter).
Does not mention us
going to Heaven or Hell.
, , See earlier section: REWARDS & PUNISHMENTS
, , and, perhaps, if you need to,
, , earlier section: JESUS PREACHED BOTH
JUDGMENT & FORGIVENESS
, , and its subsections.
The main purpose of the Old Covenant
was to prepare us for the New Covenant,
was to show (first Jews, then the rest of us) that we:
Could not get ourselves
right with God.
All needed God to rescue us, save us, do it for us.
Not merely help us.
Needed God to put us right with himself.
|
|
The Old Covenant is sometimes a humility
filter.
But Forgiveness, the New Covenant, is always
a humility filter.
It
shows you are already humble, to the extreme,
to forever put your own
righteousness to one side
and forever boast of only
Jesus’ work, for you, on the Cross.
, , Perhaps see all of earlier section:
, , REGARDNG JUDGMENT: GOD ALSO CONSIDERS MOTIVES
|
|
|
.
|
|
SO, BE CAREFUL NOT TO ENTER INTO
THE OLD COVENANT
|
|
Technically
speaking:
Jesus did not destroy the Old Covenant.
Jesus added himself to the Old Covenant
to turn it into the New Covenant.
To the system of:
o man-administered, natural, animal
sacrifices
o man-administered, natural, human
punishments
o God-administered, supernatural, curses
o God-administered, supernatural, blessings
Jesus added one more
sacrifice – himself.
|
|
.
|
|
If you are a
Christian
then read the Old Testament.
For New
Testament statements
are prophesied in the Old Testament.
For the New Testament . . was built on . . the Old Testament.
But don’t believe in, don’t
enter into,
the Old Covenant. Deut c28
to any degree.
For the New
Covenant . . . replaced . . . . . the Old
Covenant.
Don’t see Old Covenant laws
as still God’s laws, as still
active.
It would imply that there
are consequences, from God,
if you break them.
Hence, if you are a believer
(whether a gentile believer
or a Jewish believer)
and have ever failed to:
keep the Jewish
tithing law,
keep the Jewish sabbath law,
make the
appropriate sacrifice
for failing to
keep some law or other,
etc,
then do not believe that you have
cut yourself off from God to
any degree.
To believe the Old Covenant:
that your wrong actions
cut you off from
God,
is a form of unbelief
that works against:
your belief
that Jesus put
you right with his Father.
, , , , Perhaps see later section: UNBELIEF and its subsections
, , , , and
, , , , earlier section: UNCONDITIONAL
LOVE.
, And, even though:
Jesus changed God’s Old Covenant into the
New
so that God’s Old
Covenant curses no longer work,
demons would nevertheless:
impersonate God
by performing his
Old Covenant curses ‘for’ him.
, , , , See item 4)
, , , , of earlier section:
, , , , SO,
– WHERE DO TODAY’S BAD THINGS COME FROM?,, ,
, , , , and its subsections.
|
|
.
|
|
Only when you:
fully understand
that you have infinite blessings
that the New Covenant (found in New Testament) gives
should you:
articulate those blessings
As Paul does, in: Rom
c4 v1-22 & Gal
c3.
in terms of the finite
blessings
that the Old Covenant (found in
Old Testament Deut
c28 v1-14 )
would have given
were it still active.
|
|
.
|
|
Jesus’
audiences were usually Jews,
so their questions were usually Old Covenant questions.
E.G. “Which is the greatest commandment?” Matt
c22 v37 Mark
c12 v30
When you read, in the gospels,
where Jesus is speaking to the crowd,
it can be easy to identify with the crowd.
It can be easy to think:
“God told us to honour
our father & mother.
That’s why, in Matt c15 v4-9, Jesus was angry at the
Pharisees
because they etc.”
However:
God never told us
gentiles to honour our father & mother.
God never gave us
gentiles
any of the Ten
Commandments.
God gave all of the
Old Testament commandments
to only Jews.
A practicing Jew may
privately laugh
at a gentile Christian who
said that
he/she had been given the
Ten Commandments.
The Jew would think:
“Were your
ancestors at the foot of Mount Sinai
when Moses came down
with them? No. Exo c34
Why, you might even be
descended from
the peoples God drove
out for us!” Exo c34 v8-17, ,
|
|
Hence
Peter was right to tell gentile Romans:
to convert directly to Christianity,
& not become
Jews first.
Acts c10: Peter’s and Cornelius’
visions. my abbn
Hence also Paul was right to
tell gentile Greeks:
to convert directly
from Diana of the
Ephesians to Christianity,
& not become Jews first.
Acts c19:
The gospel is
resisted in Ephesus. my abbn
Gal c3 – c5: God’s Law is bondage.
God’s Spirit is freedom.
my abbreviation
|
|
.
|
|
God’s
Old Covenant’s cause-&-effect direction
was:
“You Jews: If you do what’s
right I will reward you.
Do what’s right, and you’ll
then
get the reward.”
(It’s the same direction as
the world’s way.)
God’s New Covenant’s
cause-&-effect direction is:
“I’ve given, to everyone,
every good thing, including
eternal life & my Holy Spirit.
But those who want that
package,
though having done wrong,
perhaps much wrong,
will become like me,
constructive, good,
and so do good, perhaps
even miraculous good,
and so be
persecuted.
Accept the free package,
and, out of gratitude, &
because you’ve changed, you’ll
then
do what’s right, or rather
what’s right & good.”
(It’s the opposite direction
to the world’s way.)
|
|
|
.
|
|
YOU’VE
PROBABLY ALREADY FAILED ANYWAY
|
|
Whether you are a Jew or a gentile,
it’s probable that you haven’t kept all
the Jewish laws.
And, assuming that you are a gentile Christian,
it’s probable that, where you have not
kept Jewish laws,
that you haven’t made the appropriate sacrifices
or undergone the appropriate punishment:
Exo c31 v12-15:
God
said that whoever works on the Sabbath (a Saturday)
must definitely be put to
death. my
abbreviation
Exo c35 v1-2:
God
said that whoever works on the Sabbath (a Saturday)
must definitely be put to
death. my
abbreviation
Num c15 v32-36:
A
man was found
gathering sticks on the
Sabbath (a Saturday).
God told Moses to tell
everyone to stone him to death.
So they all stoned him to
death. my
abbreviation
And, as well as failing to keep the Sabbath,
you’ve probably also failed to tithe properly.
(Mind you, as Russel Earl Kelly
puts it, in cell after next:
only Jewish farmers,
within old Israel,
could tithe.)
Indeed, the Old Covenant says that you are cursed
if you don’t keep every law.
Deut c27 v26: Cursed be he that confirmeth not
all the words of this law to
do them … ctd KJV
Most church leaders cherry-pick Old Covenant commandments:
choose the do-able ones
&/or change them to be
do-able.
Or past church leaders have done so
and today’s church leaders follow suit.
|
|
This is a good point
to show why:
a Christian who believes in
tithing
and:
a Christian who does not believe in tithing
may both get
results that support their beliefs:
Christians who do believe in tithing:
Rightly believe that the God
of the New Covenant is good.
Hence they are able to:
ignore the curses of the Old Covenant
,, ,, ,, ,, Deut c28 v15-68
yet
believe the blessings that are written
right next to
them
,, ,, ,, , Deut c28 v1-14
and,
because they believe, they receive.
, , , , See last lines of first cell
, , , , of earlier section: MY ATTITUDE TO THE BIBLE.
Whereas Christians who do not believe in tithing:
Rightly believe that the New
Covenant replaced the Old.
, , Perhaps see earlier section: THE NEW REPLACES THE
OLD.
So they don’t believe in, don’t enter into,
any of the Old Covenant.
And, even if they
started to believe
in any of the Old
Covenant,
they believe they
lack the authority:
to
believe one Old Covenant scripture
yet
ignore another Old Covenant scripture
that’s
next to it.
|
|
You might like to
see: YouTube: – Should The Church Teach
Tithing?:
a debate between Rev Mike Kola Ewuosho
and Russel Earl Kelly Ph.D.
first shown on 30th
March 2011
on the Live@nine
show, Revelation TV.
|
|
.
|
|
I reckon that
tithing is a result of us having
ten fingers & thumbs. Hence its
origins are human & worldly,
are from the counting of goods or money on fingers & thumbs.
If the idea of tithing had originated with God
I reckon it would’ve been a seventh or a twelfth.
|
|
|
.
|
|
GREAT FAITH
|
|
I saw, in one of Pastor Joseph Prince’s TV
programmes,
that he once had an interesting conversation with God
about the following two people in the Bible:
Luke c7 v1-10 (Matt c8 v5-13): my abbreviation
Jesus went to a
centurion’s house to heal his servant.
But the centurion sent
friends out, saying:
“Don’t bother coming
in, I am not worthy.
Just speak.
I
am under command.
And others are
under my command.
,, ,, ,, ,, [I understand authority]
So
your words alone will heal my servant.”
Jesus told the crowd that
the centurion had great faith.
So [Jesus spoke, and] the servant was healed.
my abbreviation
Matt c15 v21-28 (Mark c7 v25-30) my abbreviation
A Canaanite (Syrophenician) woman came to
Jesus
begging him to cast a demon
out of her daughter.
At first Jesus ignored her,
but eventually he said:
“I came for only lost
Israelites.”
She said:
“Lord, help me.”
He said:
“I’ll not throw the
children’s bread to the dogs.”
She said:
“True. But even the dogs eat the crumbs
that fall from the
master’s table.”
He said:
“You have great
faith. Have what you want.”
And her daughter was healed. my abbreviation
, , Notice that Jesus didn’t mention her great humility.
, , God knows that faith already includes humility.
, , See first cell of earlier section:
, , REGARDING JUDGMENT:
GOD ALSO CONSIDERS MOTIVES, , , ,
|
|
This
centurion and this Canaanite woman
are the only two people in
the Bible
who Jesus said had great
faith.
So Pastor Joseph Prince:
having read the
above scriptures
and having
thought the above conclusion,
asked God:
“Why
did Jesus tell only these two
that they
had great faith?”
God replied:
“What
was unusual about them?”
After about fifteen minutes Pastor Joseph Prince said:
“I
give up. What’s the answer?”
God replied:
“They
were both gentiles.”
|
|
.
|
|
I reckon that the above shows that every
generation of Jews
taught the next generation:
The
Creator is holy, and we are sinful.
So, in order to have the
Creator’s blessings,
and not his curses,
every sin must be paid for:
by the sinner
or by the sinner’s
community.
But the centurion & the Canaanite woman, not being Jews,
had not been endlessly taught this.
All they’d personally experienced was Jesus.
So they had great faith in the God of the Jews.
Or rather, great faith in the God of
love of the Jews.
|
|
|
.
|
|
CAN NEW TESTAMENT MIRACLES
BE LARGE-SCALE?
|
|
Old Testament miracles sometimes involved everyone
in the tribe of Israel. Hence they
were often large-scale.
A collective:
victory, defeat,
rescuing,
blessing,
punishment, reward,
of the whole of Israel, the
whole nation.
Can a New Testament miracle also be
large-scale?
No.
a) Jesus
commanding a storm, to instantly stop,
Matt c8 v23-27 Mark c4 v35-41 Luke c8 v22-25:
was a New Testament miracle
that seemed to be a large-scale.
But it was witnessed, as a
miracle,
by only the disciples:
Only they saw him say
“Peace, be still”
and then saw it
instantly stop.
, , , There were people, in other boats,
Mark
c4 v35-41..
, , , But they would’ve been too far away to see Jesus speak.
, , , Indeed, they were probably going the other way
, , , and partly returned, since Mark mentions only one boat
, , , ending up on the other side of the lake/sea, Mark
c5 v1-2.
b) God,
through Paul, could have stilled
the storm off Malta
(after all, Paul had raised
the dead, Acts c20 v7-12).
But, instead, God had
everyone swim or float to safety.
God saved them miraculously
but inconspicuously. Acts c27.,,,
|
|
|
.
|
|
Old Testament miracles:
were of the whole of Israel,
or were at least limited to Israel
(or to the people who would
become Israel).
, , Hence Moses led all of Israel
through the parted Red Sea
, , whether every inividual wanted to go or not.
, , Consider also Korah’s rebellion, Num c16 v1-40,
, , and God’s plague immediately afterwards, Num c16 v41-50. ,,,,,
Whereas New Testament miracles:
are of everyone,
and
are personal, individual, small scale.
, , See third cell
(starting This place is merely
temporary)
, , of earlier
section: WHY IS THE UNIVERSE SECOND CLASS?.
|
|
|
.
|
|
|
Another difference between Old Testament miracles
and New Testament miracles
is that:
Old Testament miracles were:
good,
constructive,
or:
bad, destructive.
Whereas New Testament
miracles are only ever:
good,
constructive.
,, ,, Perhaps see earlier section:
,, ,, GOD DOES NOT CHANGE
BUT HIS RELATIONSHIP WITH US CHANGES.,,,,,
,, ,, Perhaps see earlier section:
,, ,, GOOD & BAD,
RIGHT & WRONG, , , ,
|
|
|
.
|
|
|
,, ,, To understand the significance
,, ,, of New Testament miracles being only good,
being only constructive:
,, ,, , , see earlier webpage:
,, ,, , , Proof of God’s existence
,, ,, , , and, immediately after it:
,, ,, , , God’s origin., , , ,
|
|
.
|
|
GOOD
RELIGION
& BAD RELIGION
|
|
In the KJV Bible, there are only five
instances
of the word religion.
But these days, based on:
Jesus’ words & events,
in his life,
&:
Acts and the epistles,
Christians now use the word religion to
mean either:
good religion
or:
bad religion.
Bad religion is
often also called dead religion
(or just religion, dead
being shown by the context).
|
|
Dead religion:
Needs enforcing.
Has a pretend God
in the middle of it.
(A void – that a human
or demon might fill.)
Leaves God unknown.
Is all about
things you do:
rules you must keep,
laws you must keep,
things you must do.
|
Good
religion:
Is attractive.
Has God
in the middle of it.
Makes God familiar.
Is primarily about
something God did:
God fathered Jesus,
then Jesus earned, for us,
his Father’s Forgiveness
and
his Father’s Holy Spirit.
|
|
.
|
|
Dead
religion
is like the world
is like Judgment.
All three are performance based.
In
a church, dead religion:
pretends
to be Forgiveness,
indeed replaces Forgiveness,
hence:
Judgment and
Forgiveness
become:
Judgment
and ‘Judgment’,
,, ,, ,, ,, Perhaps see
earlier webpage:
,, ,, ,, ,, The two ways God sorts us: Judgment & Forgiveness., , , ,
hence
dead religion becomes:
a
soporific for the righteous
and
a cover for the wicked.
,, ,, ,, ,, Perhaps see earlier
section:
,, ,, ,, ,, JESUS’ USE OF THE WORDS ‘RIGHTEOUS’ AND
‘WICKED’, , , ,
|
|
In a church, good religion is:
God made everyone holy in his own eyes
by way of
Jesus’ Punishment in place
of all of us.
Hence God became:
a) Able
to adopt us
(if you want to be
adopted)
so that you can
expect Fatherly good care of him.
b) Able
to give us his Holy Spirit
(if you want him)
so that you,
& God’s Spirit within you,
have power to do
miracles.
,, ,, ,, ,, ‘Do’ is the verb used in the KJV. (Though see Acts c3 v12 & v16.) ,,
,, ,, ,, ,, Perhaps see earlier section: WHY GOD’S WORDS HAVE POWER.,,,
,, ,, ,, ,, Not everyone wants the Holy Spirit.
,, ,, ,, ,, See last cell (starting Mind you, even though)
,, ,, ,, ,, of earlier section: GOD THE SPIRIT.
a) and b) make life straightforward:
Matt c11 v28-30:
Come unto me, all ye that labour
and are heavy laden,
and I will give you
rest.
Take my yoke upon you,
and learn of me;
for I am meek and lowly
in heart:
and ye shall find rest
unto your souls.
For my yoke is easy,
and my burden is light. KJV
, , , A yoke is the collar on a beast of burden (horse, ox)
, , , which is connected to the burden (cart, plough).
|
|
.
|
|
In
Christianity:
Dead religion makes you think:
Earthly at worst.
Old Testament at best:
Hence you envisage
only materially
important/vital miracles,
Old Testament style miracles.
, , , Perhaps see previous section:
, , , CAN NEW TESTAMENT MIRACLES BE LARGE SCALE?.
,,,,,
Good religion makes you think:
Heavenly,
New Testament.
Hence, as well as
envisaging
materially
important/vital miracles,
you also envisage
miracles that are not materially important/vital.
Just like a number of Jesus’ miracles
were not materially
important/vital.
,, ,, ,, My comments in
orange.
Miraculously
walking on water.
Matt c14 v22-33
Walk around the
lake.
Miraculously
killing a fruitless fig tree.
Matt c21 v17-22 Mark c11 v11-25
Chop it down, or just ignore it.
Miraculously
catching a huge catch of fish.
Luke c5 v1-11,,,,,
They didn’t need the fish;
they just left them all behind.
, , , , I reckon a similar account, in John c21 v1-6,
, , , , is forged, so I ignore it.
, , , , Perhaps see earlier section: BIBLE VERSES THAT I OMIT.
,,,,,
Miraculously
feeding 5,000 people
merely
because it was late in the day.
Matt c14 v13-21
Mark c6 v31-44
Luke c9 v10-17 John c6 v5-15
Send them home before it gets any later.
, , , , This is different from another congregation, of 4,000 people,
, , , , who had already gone three days without eating.
, , , , They actually needed the food to miraculously appear
, , , , so as to sustain them for the long walk home.
, , , , Matt c15 v32 – c16 v10 Mark c8 v1-9
Miraculously
foreknowing Nathanael.
John c1 v43-51
Jesus impressed with
healing miracles anyway.
Miraculously finding a coin, in a fish’s mouth,
to
pay a tax.
Matt c17 v27
Ask around for it or borrow
it.
, , , , Changing water into
wine, John
c2 v1-11, ,,,
, , , , was not, say
medically, important/vital.
, , , , But it was socially important/vital.
, , , , See: Crisis
of Wine and Joy in Cana. ,,,,,
|
|
|
.
|
|
GOD’S METHODS
|
|
Ironically,
if Christians today
did the above miracles, the same
miracles Jesus did,
many other ‘Christians’ would accuse them
of doing demonic tricks.
I reckon it would be because:
o Such ‘Christians’ go to church
but do not believe
everything Jesus said.
o They are earthly minded
but judging heavenly
matters.
o Such miracles are not
important/vital.
|
Here are some examples of current,
unimportant, certainly not
vital, miracles.
They include some
body-changing-for-the-better miracles.
, , YouTube: –
Supernatural weight Loss?
, , and:
, , YouTube: –
Supernatural weightloss is easy on her knees
, , and:
, , YouTube: – Jesus
gave her a new tooth and more
, , and, dare I add:
, , YouTube: – Money
manifesting out of thin air.
, , (God does not forge
money,
, , so I’m sure someone, a
human, gave it, sacrificially
, , somewhere along the
line.)
, , YouTube:
– Heidi Baker: Intimacy for Miracles – CBN.com
, , See: creating chicken
& beads, at: 2m 30s to
5m 45s.
, YouTube:
– GIRL'S BACK OF THE HEAD GREW 15 mm,
jaws and ears
realigned!. ,,,,,
|
.
|
Such ‘Christians’ might also condemn:
laughing
in the Spirit, being drunk in the Spirit,
being slain in the Spirit,
shaking in the Spirit,
burning in the Spirit, etc.
Regarding normal, earthly, laughter:
It needs
knowledge of two (or perhaps more)
different,
earthly, concepts/situations
before a sudden
punch-line reveals
their incongruous
juxtaposition.
(Sudden relief is how a
comedy punch-line works.)
Whereas, regarding laughing
in the Spirit,
you see that you have already moved:
Out of the
kingdom of the world
(this temporary,
judging, world
with its good
side and bad side).
Into the eternal
kingdom of light.
What it lacks in suddenness
it gains in greatness of
relief.
, , In 1907 Smith
Wigglesworth once inadvertently caused
, , eleven of his
congregation to fall to the floor,
, , helplessly laughing.
, , Perhaps see near end
of:
, , WIGGLESWORTH
BAPTISED IN THE HOLY SPIRIT,
, , or
, , ch5 (p49) of Smith Wigglesworth: Apostle of Faith,
, , by Stanley H Frodsham.
, , Perhaps also see:
, , YouTube:
– The FIRE of the HOLY SPIRIT comes down:
Peterborough
UK revival meetings..,,,,,
, , A short, 13m, video of the miraculous.
, , , I suspect that all the burning
, , , was build up, or somesuch,
, , , to the ‘demon wrapped around the head’
deliverance, at 8m 38s.
, , , At 10m 56s, ‘That your joy might be full” lesson
, , , makes sense to me.
, , , John c14 v1-11 John c16 v23-24 1 John c1 v1-4,,,,,
|
.
|
Christians
vary in their methods of ministry.
Perhaps see eighth cell (starting Mark Hemans, Australian)
of earlier section ABOUT BIBLICAL
TEACHER-HEALERS GENERALLY.
Mark blows the Holy Spirit
onto the microphone
as well as onto the
person. John c20 v22,,,,,
He also does the ‘laying on
of the foot’
as well as laying on of
hand(s).
Deut c34 v9
Acts c8 v17-19
Acts c9 v17
Acts c19 v6,,,,,
Mark also (believes, and
therefore) often experiences
God’s Spirit, in him, and
around him,
healing & delivering
with the person experiencing
a feeling of burning. Matt c3 v11
Luke c3 v16,,,,,
|
For
Jesus, and for any Christian,
God’s Spirit seems to guide a minister
to vary these practices:
in some ways, to some
degree,
from minister to minister
& from patient to
patient,
healing or delivering one
person one way
another person another,
even when it’s the same
illness
or a similar demonic
problem.
The above may seem random.
But I reckon it varies according to:
the healer,
the patient,
the sickness,
the nature of the demonic
oppression,
& the circumstances.
o Does the patient believe the gospel?
If so, do they believe that
God will heal them now?
o If they have belief, do
they also have unbelief, doubts,
e.g. does this sickness
scare them?
o Are there people, close
to them,
who may be causing them to doubt?
If not, might they
discourage them later
and so cause them to lose the healing they gained?
o Even if they believe
are they also sinning?
If
so, has that sin/wrong invited a demon in
who is obstructing the
healing?
o Etc.
|
.
|
Most
Christians assume that Jesus’ methods,
or rather the Holy Spirit’s methods, enacted through Jesus:
Were, and are, perfect.
Are
what we should all be aiming for.
If so, then:
laughing
in the Spirit, being drunk in the Spirit,
being slain in the Spirit,
shaking in the Spirit,
burning in the Spirit, etc,
are
all part of an inferior phase, that
we are now in.
For Jesus did none of these
things.
Also, we speak in tongues,
but Jesus did not.
Also, Paul wrote that
tongues, prophesies, & knowledge,
will all cease. 1 Cor c13 Note v8.
, , Makes sense when
you think about it.
All this
means that we are in an inferior, passing, phase.
|
Indeed, Jesus said that we would
do greater miracles
than he did:
John c14
v12-14:
Verily, verily, I say unto you,
He that believeth on me,
the works that I do
shall he do also;
and greater works than these shall he do;
because
I go unto my Father.
, , , [i.e. I die – so that he can send you the
Holy Spirit, permanently.]
And whatsoever ye shall ask in my name,
that will I do,
that the Father may be glorified in the
Son.
If ye shall ask any thing in my name,
I will do it. KJV
, , , Perhaps see later section: CONTINUING
THE SON’S WORK
, , , and
, , , earlier section: GODLY SELF-CONFIDENCE., , .
That this isn’t happening
yet
supports the idea
that we are in an inferior,
passing, phase.
|
.
|
Some Christians heal people a whole
crowd at a time,
a method that Jesus never used.
Jesus’ method, the
one-at-a-time method, is best
because there’s the
opportunity
for, perhaps vital,
discourse;
discourse in the form of:
words of knowledge, words of
wisdom, and prophesy.
Mark c9 v21-24 Luke c7 v6-10 Mark c7 v24-30 ,,,,,
, , For the difference between
prophesy and words of knowledge
, , see: YouTube: – Prophetic Word vs. Word of Knowledge
//
Katia Adams // Vineyard Insights. ,,,,,
|
Smith
Wigglesworth was the first
to miraculously heal a whole crowd at a time.
Others have since followed suit.
YouTube: – Revival is Now London Miracle
Moments – Day 1. ,,,
Kathryn Krick ministers to one person at a time
but after 3m 51s ministers to everyone.
YouTube: – MARK HEMANS – Jesus Encounter
Ministries @MarkHemans. ,,,
I've never seen Mark minister to more than one
person at a time.
Smith
Wigglesworth only healed en-masse
because he was forced to do so, by
the Swiss police:
The police were going to
arrest him
for “practicing medicine
without a license”
if he continued to heal
people individually.
Presumably they saw it as
healing
if he laid his hands on
people
or gave them individual
attention.
But as not healing
if he healed people a whole
crowd at a time
without touching them,
which is what, in Switzerland,
he then continued to do.
, , Perhaps see: YouTube: – Insider view of Smith Wigglesworth, 2m 15s.
, , Or ch6 (p68 onwards)
of Smith Wigglesworth: Apostle of Faith,
, , by Stanley H Frodsham,
(also ch9 p113 onwards).
|
|
.
|
|
Home page
|
Next webpage:
Demons love laws.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|